This update to CKC (Local) revises the Multihazard Emergency Operations Plan section to clarify compliance language and adds a new "Notification Regarding Violent Activity" section requiring the Superintendent to adopt District procedures based on TEA model standards for notifying parents and guardians about violent activity, including electronic notification requirements and law enforcement notification provisions.
Legal Compliance Details Mixed
AI-generated assessment. Verify citations independently before relying on this analysis.
Adoption and implementation of Multihazard Emergency Operations Plan for use in district facilities Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.108(a)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Plan must address prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, reunification, and recovery Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.108(a)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: The policy removed 'reunification' from its enumerated list, which creates a potential gap relative to the statutory requirement. This removal is noted but does not change the statutory classification of the underlying mandate.
Superintendent adoption of District procedures based on TEA model standards for notifying parents/guardians about violent activity Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.1131 (H.B. 3, 88th Leg., R.S., 2023)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: The policy delegates adoption to the Superintendent specifically and specifies 'District procedures' rather than a board-level policy — this delegation mechanism is a local structural choice, though the underlying mandate is statutory.
Scope of notification: violent activity at campus, other district facility, or district-sponsored activity, to parents/guardians/persons in parental relation Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.1131 (H.B. 3, 88th Leg., R.S., 2023)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Electronic notification through text messaging and e-mail or other electronic communication method Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.1131 (H.B. 3, 88th Leg., R.S., 2023)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: The policy adds 'or other electronic communication method' beyond the statutory text, which specifies only text messaging and e-mail. This expansion is a local addition.
Option for real-time notification Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.1131 (H.B. 3, 88th Leg., R.S., 2023)
Verified via: TEA guidance — the statute analysis cites this as a model standards requirement but the verbatim quote provided does not include 'real-time notification' language explicitly; classification rests on TEA guidance cross-reference rather than confirmed verbatim quote
Local additions: Because the verbatim statute text in the analysis does not contain an explicit 'real-time notification' quote, this element is grounded only in TEA guidance. The classification is Required by Law contingent on TEA model standards adopted pursuant to TEC §37.1131, but official verification at Texas Legislature Online is recommended.
Student privacy protection in notification procedures Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC §37.1131 (H.B. 3, 88th Leg., R.S., 2023)
Verified via: TEA guidance — the verbatim statute text in the analysis does not include an explicit 'protect student privacy' quote; classification rests on TEA model standards adopted pursuant to TEC §37.1131
Local additions: Because the verbatim statute text in the analysis does not contain an explicit student privacy protection quote, this element is grounded only in TEA model standards pursuant to the statutory delegation. Official verification at Texas Legislature Online is recommended.
Notification to law enforcement and emergency response officials where appropriate Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified — no verbatim quote in the statute analysis supports a mandatory law enforcement notification requirement under TEC §37.1131 or TEC §37.108 as analyzed
Local additions: The statute analysis provides no verbatim quote requiring law enforcement notification. Per the grounding rule, this element is classified as Locally Discretionary. The qualifier 'where appropriate' further confirms board discretion in implementation. This may be grounded in unanalyzed portions of TEC §37.108 (subsections (a)(2)-(7) and (f) were not retrieved); official verification is strongly recommended.
Clarification language: 'in accordance with state law or regulation, Board Policy, or District Procedure' Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: No statute cited in analysis
Local additions: This is board-chosen compliance clarification language not mandated by any statute identified in the analysis.