This is a new local policy (DGC, Version 1) for Conroe ISD that establishes definitions and immunity protections for professional employees from disciplinary proceedings when they report Chapter 37 violations or take good-faith actions to remove disruptive, unruly, or bullying students from class. The entire policy is new language, driven by a legislative change.
Legal Compliance Details Mixed
AI-generated assessment. Verify citations independently before relying on this analysis.
Definition of 'Disciplinary Proceeding' (district discharge/suspension/contract termination or nonrenewal; SBEC action) Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(a), enacted by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: web search confirmed — TEC § 22.05121 text confirmed at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Local additions: The policy's two-part numbered definition of 'disciplinary proceeding' mirrors the statutory definition verbatim. No locally added categories are present.
Immunity from disciplinary proceedings for reporting a Chapter 37 violation to another professional employee, the agency, or a law enforcement agency Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(b)(1), enacted by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: web search confirmed — verbatim statutory text confirmed at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Local additions: None. Policy language tracks the statute verbatim. The mandatory 'may not be subject to' language compels the district to recognize and implement this immunity in its own proceedings.
Immunity from disciplinary proceedings for good-faith removal of a student who repeatedly interferes with the teacher's ability to communicate effectively or with classmates' ability to learn (TEC § 37.002(b)(1)) Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(b)(2) and TEC § 37.002(b)(1), as amended by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: verbatim statute text — confirmed in statute analysis
Local additions: None. The sub-category tracks TEC § 37.002(b)(1) removal grounds directly.
Immunity from disciplinary proceedings for good-faith removal of a student who demonstrates unruly, disruptive, or abusive behavior toward the teacher, another adult, or another student (TEC § 37.002(b)(2)) MixedStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(b)(2) and TEC § 37.002(b)(2), as amended by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: verbatim statute text — confirmed in statute analysis
Local additions: The statute requires that unruly, disruptive, or abusive behavior 'seriously interferes' with teaching or learning. The policy omits the 'seriously interferes' threshold qualifier and instead states the behavior is 'unruly, disruptive, or abusive toward the teacher, another adult, or another student.' This paraphrase is a locally chosen drafting adaptation that broadens the immunity's articulated scope beyond the statutory standard, making this element Mixed.
Immunity from disciplinary proceedings for good-faith removal of a student who engages in bullying as defined by TEC § 37.0832 (TEC § 37.002(b)(3)) Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(b)(2) and TEC § 37.002(b)(3), as amended by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: verbatim statute text — confirmed in statute analysis
Local additions: None. Policy language mirrors the statutory removal ground verbatim.
Statement that immunity under this policy is cumulative and may not be construed to interfere with any other immunity provided by law Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 22.05121(c), enacted by H.B. 6, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066, eff. June 20, 2025
Verified via: web search confirmed — verbatim text confirmed at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Local additions: The policy substitutes 'provided by this policy' for 'provided by Subsection (b),' which is an immaterial local drafting adaptation for readability. No substantive local additions are present.