This update to EFB (LOCAL) comprehensively restructures Conroe ISD's library materials policy by adding new definitions for "library materials" and "Subject Persons," creating a Superintendent-led collection development framework with a designated district-level library supervisor, establishing Board approval and public review processes for library materials, formalizing parental opt-out and checkout record requirements, replacing the old "School Library Selection Process" section with streamlined Board-level evaluation procedures, creating two distinct appeal tracks for Board decisions and District actions, and moving the Superintendent compliance certification deadline from February 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026 while removing several previously proposed sections that were consolidated or reorganized.
Legal Compliance Details Mixed
AI-generated assessment. Verify citations independently before relying on this analysis.
Expanded definition of 'library materials' to include online catalogs, mobile apps, classroom libraries, and all forms of student access Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.021 (amended by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District extended the definition to cover classroom libraries, mobile applications, and any library catalog a student may access — specific applications beyond the statutory mandate to adhere to collection development standards
Definition of 'Subject Persons' covering employees, volunteers, contractors, and vendors Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District created a locally defined class of persons subject to library materials standards; no statute requires or authorizes this specific definitional construct
Superintendent procedures to prohibit possession, acquisition, and purchase of certain library materials by Subject Persons and students Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District locally elected to prohibit possession and acquisition by employees, volunteers, contractors, vendors, and students; no statute mandates such prohibition procedures
Designation of a District-level library supervisor responsible for catalog development and District procedures Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District created a specific administrative role not required by statute; collection development standards (TEC § 33.021) require adherence but do not prescribe this staffing structure
Requirement that a SBEC-certified professional librarian or trained library staff be responsible for evaluation, selection, acquisition, maintenance, reconsideration, and deselection of library materials Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District chose to require certified or trained library professionals for collection functions; TEC § 33.021 mandates adherence to TSLAC collection development standards but the verbatim statute text provided does not specify staffing requirements
Collection development framework: Superintendent responsibility for collection assessment, evaluation procedures, and Board evaluation/selection/acquisition/deselection processes Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.021 (amended by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025); TEC § 33.026 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District assigned Superintendent as collection development lead and specified assessment and evaluation cycle; statute requires adherence to collection development standards and adoption of an acquisition policy but does not specify the Superintendent as the responsible officer
Superintendent procedures regarding student access to materials rated 'sexually relevant' under TEC § 35.001 Locally DiscretionaryStatutory basis: TEC § 35.001 (added by H.B. 900, 88th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2023)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District created access procedures tied to the TEC § 35.001 definition; the statute analysis contains only a definition provision with no requirement or permission quote supporting a mandate to adopt specific access procedures
Superintendent compliance with TEC § 33.025(g)-(h) meeting requirements (at least twice yearly) when no local school library advisory council is established Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.025 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District specified the meeting frequency as 'at least two times each year'; statute mandates compliance with meeting requirements under § 33.025(g)-(h) but the verbatim text provided does not specify frequency — frequency is a local addition
Collection development procedures posted on District webpage and reviewed at least every three years Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District locally required public posting and triennial review cycle for collection development procedures; no statute in the analysis mandates publication or periodic review of these procedures
District adoption of evaluation, selection, acquisition, reconsideration, and deselection criteria (criteria 1-11, including TEKS alignment, community values, ethnic/religious/cultural representation, parent/community recommendations, educator consultation) MixedStatutory basis: TEC § 33.021 (amended by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025); TEC § 28.002 (Required Curriculum)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: Adherence to TSLAC collection development standards is required; TEKS-curriculum alignment is required. However, criteria 10 (parent/community recommendations) and 11 (educator consultations), and the prohibition on content-based or author-based deselection are locally chosen additions not expressly mandated by the verbatim statute text provided
Prohibition on deselecting or removing library materials based solely on ideas, author background, or character background Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District added a content-neutrality anti-censorship principle; no statute in the analysis requires or authorizes this specific protection
Board approval of library materials: public 30-day pre-vote accessibility on District webpage, Board member review and proposal rights, Board vote at first open meeting on or after 30th day Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.026 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: The 30-day minimum public accessibility window and Board member proposal rights are locally specified; statute requires an acquisition policy with procurement and donation procedures but does not specify a 30-day notice period or board member proposal rights in the verbatim text provided
Prohibition on adding donated library materials without Board approval; exceptions for replacement copies, additional copies, and previously approved ISBN/grade-level matches Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.026 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: The specific ISBN-based exceptions for replacement copies, additional copies, and previously Board-approved grade-level matches are locally constructed; statute requires a policy governing donated materials but does not specify these exception categories
Parental access to library catalog and parental opt-out procedures (electronic/physical form or online catalog system) Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.023 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District added catalog warning language about content and opt-out procedure; statute mandates parent access and opt-out procedures via electronic/physical form or online catalog
Statement that parents are the primary decision makers regarding student access to library materials Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District made a locally chosen policy declaration affirming parental primacy; no statute in the analysis mandates this specific statement
District library materials webpage requirements (catalog, materials lists, Board policies, challenge forms, CIPA disclosure, feedback opportunities, other resources) MixedStatutory basis: TEC § 33.023 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025); TEC § 33.026 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025); TEC § 33.027 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: Required: parent catalog access (TEC § 33.023), materials lists for acquisition (TEC § 33.026), challenge forms (TEC § 33.027). Locally added: CIPA compliance disclosure, feedback opportunities, Board policy links, other library resources, and the specific eight-item webpage content list
Classroom and individual library restrictions: employees may only use District/campus-approved materials with approved labels; prohibition on personal library collections in classrooms Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District locally imposed restrictions on classroom library materials including labeling requirements and prohibition on personal library collections; no statute in the analysis mandates these specific classroom library procedures
Employee submission of library materials for catalog inclusion requiring Board approval Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.026 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District created an employee submission pathway; statute requires Board acquisition policy and donation procedures, which necessarily encompasses this scenario, though the employee-specific submission mechanism is locally constructed
Challenge process: TEA-adopted form requirement, distribution to Superintendent/library supervisor/librarian/Board, posting on public webpage, restriction of access to challenged materials pending District action Required by LawStatutory basis: TEC § 33.027 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: District specified distribution to Superintendent, library supervisor, librarian, and Board — beyond the statute's council notice requirement; statute requires use of TEA-adopted form and council notification within 5 days. The access restriction pending Board action, public posting of the challenge form, and challenger timeline notification are local additions
Two-track appeal structure: (1) Appeal of Board of Trustees decision on library material challenge (with two-year bar on repeat appeals); (2) Appeal of District action (non-Board) to the Board MixedStatutory basis: TEC § 33.027 (added by S.B. 13, 89th Leg., R.S., eff. Sept. 1, 2025)
Verified via: verbatim statute text
Local additions: Statute permits appeal of District action to the Board (Track 2). The two-year bar on repeat appeals of Board decisions (Track 1) and the prohibition on appealing Board decisions under FNG(LOCAL) or DGBA(LOCAL) are locally constructed restrictions not found in the verbatim statute text provided
Standard of review: Board shall follow the law; District may develop forms to assist Board; final Board challenge decisions may not be appealed under FNG(LOCAL) or DGBA(LOCAL) Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District specified that Board applies a legal compliance standard of review and foreclosed standard grievance policy appeals; no verbatim statute text in the analysis prescribes a standard of review or prohibits grievance-based appeals of Board challenge decisions
Superintendent compliance certification deadline extended from February 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026 Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District moved its internally set certification deadline; no statute in the analysis establishes a Superintendent certification deadline
Collaboration with local public libraries and community organizations where feasible Locally DiscretionaryVerified via: unverified
Local additions: District retained this collaborative goal; no statute in the analysis mandates joint agreements or collaboration with public libraries